CENTRAL ASIA: THE BUMPY ROAD TOWARDS POLITICAL MATURITY
Keywords:
Central Asia, politics, political process, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, UzbekistanAbstract
Following the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the new Central Asian independent states of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan replaced the Soviet republics of Central (Sredniaia) Asia and Kazakhstan. By the time they gained independence, these countries had already developed specific mechanisms of governance: The Communist Party and state structures had relied, to a great extent, on certain regional clan principles of decision-making inherited from their distant past. The new states immediately declared that they would strive to build Western-style political systems. They elected their presidents and parliaments, set up judicial systems, yet the political elites proved unable to realize the democratic standards of the West they supported in words. Over the course of three decades, heads of state, who dominated and still remain the dominant figures in their countries and are responsible for domestic and foreign policies have replaced each other without any real competition. None of the regional states can boast of competitive presidential elections. On the other hand, even though their political development may have external similarities, there are still numerous differences rooted in their very different past, cultures and mentalities. The regional clan division, swept under the carpet during the Soviet period, was revived as an important and highly influential feature. Kazakhstan was divided into zhuzes; Kyrgyzstan is in the midst of an ongoing regional confrontation between the South and the North; in Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan regional clans have gradually gained a lot of political weight. This means that the leaders of all Central Asian countries had no choice but to take into account the interests of groups and clans and the ties between different tribes, which inevitably affected the principles of governance and choice of officials.
The personal characteristics of leaders who came to power after the Soviet Union had left the stage and their interpretations of the ongoing processes played a huge role in regional developments, the relationships between the regional states, the regional balance of power and the political situation.
Today, all the above-mentioned countries with the exception of Tajikistan, have elected new presidents either amid domestic political turmoil or through a power transit within the same group.
This means that in all Central Asian countries presidential elections are not seen as an instrument of change of power but, rather, as an instrument of remaining in power. The complicated economic situation, the non-regional actors that put pressure on the local political elites and, recently, the COVID-19 pandemic, which intensified the social and economic problems, did nothing positive for the political and economic stability in Central Asia.
Downloads
References
See: A.I. Kuzmin, “Prichiny i uroki grazhdanskoy voiny,” in: Postsovetskaia Tsentralnaia Azia. Poteri i obretenia, Vostochnaia literatura RAN, Moscow, 1998, pp. 215-294.
See: Kh. Adeeb, Central Asia: A New History from the Imperial Conquests to the Present, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2021, p. 442.
See: Tsentralnaia Azia: 1991-2009 gg., monograph, ed. by B.K. Sultanov, KISI at the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 2010, p. 199.
See: K.P. Dudarev, “Postkommunisticheskiy avtoritarny rezhim,” in: Postsovetskaia Tsentralnaia Azia. Poteri i obretenia, p. 167.
See: E.T. Seylekhanov, Politicheskaia Sistema Respubliki Kazakhstan: opyt razvitia i perspektivy, KISI at the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty, 2009, p. 62.
See: R.N. Zhanguzhin, Kazakhstan postsovetskiy, Institute of Economics and International Relations, National Aca- demy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, 2002, p. 129.
See: M. Karsakov, “Osobennosti transformatsii politicheskoy sistemy Kazakhstana v kontse 80kh-serediny 90kh go- dov,” Tsentralnaia Azia, No. 14, 1998, pp. 34-56.
See: A.D. Bogaturov, A.S. Dundich, V.G. Korgun, et al., Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenia v Tsentralnoy Azii: sobytiia i dokumenty, Aspekt Press, Moscow, 2011, p. 19.
See: S.S. Zhiltsov, “Political Processes in Central Asia: Peculiarities, Problems, Prospects,” Central Asia and the Caucasus, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2016, pp. 21-29.
See: D.B. Malysheva, “Paradoksy natsionalnoy idei i problemy stanovlenia gosudarstvennosti v postsovetskom prostranstve,” MEiMO, No. 11, 1998, pp. 151-155.
See: A. Kurtov, Demokratia vyborov v Kazakhstane: avtoritarnaia transformatsia, ASTI-IZDAT, Moscow, 2001,p. 331.
See: UNDP Chief lauds Kyrgyzstan’s Democratic Transition and MDG Progress, 17 May, 2011, available at [https://reliefweb.int/report/kyrgyzstan/undp-chief-lauds-kyrgyzstan%E2%80%99s-democratic-transition-and-mdg-progress], 23 August, 2021.
See: D.A. Aleksandrov, I.V. Ippolitov, S.D. Popov, “Miagkaia sila kak instrument amerikanskoy politiki v Tsentral- noy Azii,” in: Tsentralnaia Azia: Problemy i perspektivy (vzgliad iz Rossii i Kitaia), RISI, Moscow, 2013, p. 28.
See: S.S. Zhiltsov, op. cit.
See: Tsentralnaia Azia segodnia: vyzovy i ugrozy, ed. by K.L. Syroezhkin, KISI, Almaty, 2011, p. 21
See: S.S. Zhiltsov, I. Zonn, “Political Development of Kazakhstan: Results and Prospects,” Central Asia and the Caucasus. English Edition, Vol. 20, Issue 4, 2019, pp. 62-69.
See: S.S. Zhiltsov, “Tsentralnaia Azia: osobennosti politicheskogo razvitia,” Vestnik Diplomaticheskoy akademii MID Rossii. Rossia i mir, No. 1, 2020, pp. 143-160.
See: G. Abishev, “Nyneshniy sostav kazakhstanskogo parlamenta ustarel—mesto dolzhny zaniat odnomandatniki, 14 July, 2019, available at [https://ia centr.ru/experts/gaziz-abishev/nyneshniy-sostav-kazakhstanskogo-parlamenta-ustarel-ikh- mesto-dolzhny-zanyat-odnomandatniki/], 16 August, 2021.
E. Ionova, “Kazakhstan v period tranzita vlasti,” Rossia i novye gosudarstva Evrazii, No. 1, 2020, pp. 82-97
See: Kyrgyzstan Election: Sunday’s Results Annulled After Mass Protests, 6 October, 2020, available at [https:// www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-54432030], 10 October, 2021.
See: “Iz tiurmy v presidenty za tri mesiatsa,” 11 January, 2021, available at [https://www.rbc.ru/politics/11/01/2021/5 27 September, 2021.
See: “Freedom House. Nations in Transit 2020: Kyrgyzstan,” available at [https://freedomhouse.org/country/ kyrgyzstan/nations-transit/2020], 24 September, 2021
See: “Kyrgyzstan: Withdraw Problematic Draft Constitution,” Human Rights Watch, 5 March, 2021, available at [https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/03/05/kyrgyzstan-withdraw-problematic-draft-constitution], 24 September, 2021
See: R.Yu. Khadyrov, “Osobennosti politicheskoy sistemy Tadzhikistana,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 2, 2016, pp. 104-111.
See: R.Yu. Khadyrov, “Rol klanov vo vnutrenney politike Tadzhikistana,” in: Aktualnye problemy razvitia post-sovetskogo prostranstva: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (Moskva, 2 April, 2015), МГОУ, Мoscow, 2015, p. 124.
See: E. Luzanova, “Mezhdunarodny seminar ‘Politicheskoe razvitie Tsentralnoy Azii i Tsentralnoy Evropy: skhodstvo, razlichia, puti sotrudnichestva,” Tsentralnaia Azia, No. 10, 1997.
See: V. Tuleshov, “K voprosu o formirovanii i razvitii identichnosti v Kazakhstane i Tsentralnoy Azii,” in: Tsentralnaia Azia-25: mysli o proshlom, proektsiia budushchego, ed. by M. Laruelle, A. Kurmanova, The Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies at George Washington University, Washington, 2017, pp. 36-38.
See: Kh.Kh. Khurramov, “Vzaimootnoshenia oppozitsii i vlastey v Tadzhikistane: istoria i sovremennost,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, No. 2, 2016, pp. 112-116.
See: Vyzovy bezopasnosti v Tsentralnoy Azii, ed. by A.A. Dynkin, V.G. Baranovskiy, IMEMO, Moscow, 2013, 150 pp.
See: M.A. Neymark, “Kultura kak resurs natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii,” in: Sovremenny mir i geopolitika,Kanon+, Moscow, 2015, pp. 158-175.
See: R. Agaev, “TsAR: problemy evoliutsii politicheskikh system,” in: Tsentralnaia Azia: geopolitika i ekonomika regiona, Krasnaia Zvezda, Moscow, 2010, p. 15.
See: D.E. Furman, “Evoliutsia politicheskikh sistem stran SNG,” in: Sredizemnomorye-Chernomorye-Kaspiy: mezhdu Bolshoy Evropoy i Bolshim Blizhnim Vostokom, ed. by N.P. Shmelev, V.A. Guseynov, A.D. Yazkova, Granitsa, Moscow, 2006, p. 136.
See: Tsenralnaia azia i Kaspiyskiy region: riski, vyzovy, ugrozy: kollectivnaia monogra
See: S.S. Zhiltsov, “Koronavirus udaril po stranam postsovetskogo prostranstva,” Problemy postsovetskogo prostranstva, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2020, pp. 8-17, available at [https://doi.org/10.24975/2313-8920-2020-7-1-8-17].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
