DIASPORAS AS INFORMAL TOOLS FOR REGULATING MIGRATION IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION

Authors

  • Sergey RYAZANTSEV D.Sc. (Econ.), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences,Head of the Center of Social Demography of the Institute of Socio-Political Research, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor at RUDN University and GIMO University, Head of the Demographic Processes Research Laboratory, National Research University BelSu (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Alexander TER-AKOPOV Ph.D. (Econ.), Research Fellow at the Center for Social Demography of the Institute of Socio-Political Research, Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Elena PISMENNAIA D.Sc. (Sociol.), Professor at the Department of Sociology, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow, Russian Federation) Author
  • Anna LUKYANOVA Ph.D. (Econ.), Associate Professor at the North Caucasus Federal University (Stavropol, Russian Federation) Author

Keywords:

labor migration, informal regulation tools, diaspora, ethnic economy, adaptation and integration of migrants.

Abstract

The article examines the problems of diasporization and defines the concept of "modern diaspora." The formation of large diasporas from Central Asian countries is the result of prolonged and large-scale migration from that region to Russia. Migration acts as a kind of catalyst for change in the ethnic composition of the population. Social networks are an additional "pull" factor for those who want to leave their country in search of work. Diasporas have significant socioeconomic resources and can influence decision-making in the area of government regulation, as well as socioeconomic processes. There is a direct relationship between the scale of migration and the size of the diaspora, that is, the choice of destination for emigrants is largely determined by the development level and size of the diaspora. On the one hand, diasporas are actors that help migrants to adapt to the new conditions and integrate into the host society, serving as a buffer between the migrants and the local population, and on the other hand, they help to form ethnic enclaves with an ethnic economy in areas with a high concentration of migrants. The article also notes that for the successful integration of migrants in Russia, it is necessary to harmonize industrial relations by improving working conditions and remuneration, to improve the system for the legal protection of migrants, simplify the procedure for acquiring citizenship and make it more transparent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ryazantsev, S., Bogdanov, I., Dobrokhleb, V., & Lukyanets, A. (2017). Migration from Central Asian Countries to Russia and Kazakhstan in the Context of Integration Processes in the Eurasian Economic Union Format. *Central Asia and the Caucasus*, 18(1), 39-49.

Ryazantsev, S., & Khoriye, N. (2011). *Modelirovanie potokov trudovoi migratsii iz stran Tsentralnoi Azii v Rossiu. Ekonomiko-sotsiologicheskoie issledovanie*. Moscow: Nauchnyi Mir, p. 15.

Ryazantsev, S., & Bozhenko, V. (2014). New Approaches to Managing Labor Migration under Integration in EurAsEC. *Asian Social Sciences*, 10(20), 195-200.

Rybakovskiy, L. L. (2001). Migratsia naselenia: stadii migratsionnogo protsessa. *Migratsia v Rossii*, 5, 11.

Eurasian Development Bank. (2014). EDB Report Posledstvia vstuplenia Kyrgyzstana v Tamozhennyi soiuz i YeEP dlia rynka truda i chelovecheskogo kapitala strany. Retrieved from [http://www.eabr.org/general//upload/CII%20 -%20izdania/Proekti%20i%20dokladi/Kyrgyzstan%20%20CU/EDB_Centre_Report_13_Presentation_Rus_1.pdf](http://www.eabr.org/general//upload/CII%20-%20izdania/Proekti%20i%20dokladi/Kyrgyzstan%20%20CU/EDB_Centre_Report_13_Presentation_Rus_1.pdf).

Popkov, V. (2003). *Fenomen etnicheskikh diaspor*. Moscow, p. 74.

Toshchenko, Zh. T., & Chaptykova, T. I. (2004). Diaspora kak ob’iekt sotsiologicheskogo issledovania. *Sotsiologicheskie issledovania*, 3, 16-19.

Ryazantsev, S. V. (2016). Emigranty iz Rossii: russkaia diaspora ili russkogovoriashchie soobshchestva? *Sotsiologicheskie issledovania*, 12, 93-104.

Shakleina, T. A., & Baikov, A. A. (Eds.). (2014). *Megatrendy: Osnovnye traektorii evoliutsii mirovogo poriadka v XXI veke* (2nd ed., revised and enlarged). Moscow: Aspekt Press Publishers, p. 136.

Strelchenko, S. V. (2006). Diaspora kak sub’iekt sotsialno-ekonomicheskikh protsessov (Sotsialno-filsofsky analiz naiboleie obshchikh tendentsi v proshlom i nastoiashchem). *Energia*, 7, 65-66.

Khrustalev, M. A. (2010). *Metodologia prikladnogo politicheskogo analiza*. Moscow.

Tishkov, V. A. (2003). *Rekviem po etnosu: Issledovania po sotsialno-kulturnoi antropologii*. Moscow: Nauka Publishers.

Bromley, Yu. V. (1973). *Etnos i etnografia*. Moscow.

Akhiezer, A. S. (2001). Mezhdu Ya i drugim. *Mir psikhologii*, 3, 12-15.

Ryazantsev, S. (2013). Russia Needs a New Migration Policy. *Russian Politics and Law*, 1(3), 80-88.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

Issue

Section

ETHNIC RELATIONS AND MIGRATION

How to Cite

RYAZANTSEV, S., TER-AKOPOV, A., PISMENNAIA, E., & LUKYANOVA, A. (2017). DIASPORAS AS INFORMAL TOOLS FOR REGULATING MIGRATION IN THE EURASIAN ECONOMIC UNION. CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 18(3), 35-42. https://www.ca-c.org/CAC/index.php/cac/article/view/1387

Plaudit

Similar Articles

1-10 of 589

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2